A recent research has shown that start a diet with foods of low index caloric could cause the opposite effect to that sought to start the diet: cause overweight. The researchers believe that this phenomenon is due to that the Agency interprets this reduction heat conductors in the diet, as a sign of stress on the body, and activates its physiological survival mechanisms to reduce spending caloric preserving reserves energy that possesses. Therefore it is normal that when you begin a diet feel tiredness or lack of encouragement, by the organism seeks to reduce spending caloric and a body that is at rest will have a lower caloric expenditure. The researchers checked their results in an experiment with rats that were somertidas to a low calorie diet for a period of 180 days, as a result is found a marked increase in the overweight of obesity and lingual receptors in rats rats. Scientists noticed that older rats used in the experiment do not mostly gained weight, the researchers believe that this related to the ability of rats to differentiate through receivers located in their language that enable them to differentiate those foods that have more calories and reject them. Unlike the rats more young people who had not developed this recognition mechanism of high and low calories, ate food that gatillaban food its obesity problem, in the light of these findings the researchers propose a balanced diet every four hours instead of a low calorie diet without forgetting also the important role of the cardiovascular type and anaerobic exerciseSuch a discovery could help make an effective fight against the increasingly growing problems of diabetes and obesity this interesting discovery problems is strong evidence that the diets fast are no.


In this direction the values had acquired in the current days a great importance and started to be tematizao object. This relativismo which we speak above in them led not to possess safe criteria that in the light one to distinguish the good from the evil, beauty of the ugly one, the certain the wrong one, everything is relative and depends on the conception of each one. Everything this took in them to a great crisis of values. They are not more as invariant and yes before dumb at every moment as the desire of the humanity. Nietzsche it corroborates with us when it comes to affirm that absolute values do not exist. These are always product of vehemence egoistic of the individuals. One of the biggest crises that we face today in the hodiernos days is in the models and the familiar relations.

That family model was passed to we for our ancestor? which model of family who the society has today in the presented one? Being in the family the place where we acquire our values first. Our families today are in crisis, for this changeability of models that we have today. With the sped up addition of the dissolution marriage, where they start to exist new types of unions, where nor the parents not even the school is prepared to teach to the children this new present reality in the society. Ahead of this reality where the values are relative and subjective, and they are they that conduct the world, becomes necessary terms a new conformity around the values and that this in them serves of signal for terms each time plus a society pautada in the ethical and igualitrios values, thus to conquer consequently a good convivncia wants either particular or universal.


If in them to attempt against sconsideraes of this paragraph, we will see characteristic there of thought conceptistaque, in my opinion, translates with perfection the human baroque thought. The man of today baroque to how much that one of the past ‘ ‘ polarizadopor contradictory forces and inspired by the dither of the mystery religioso’ ‘ , sedento for the mystery the holy ghost to justify its existence and placing nooposto of ideas and words the formula of its soul: one to be that it lives we dosextremos, that it breathes the good and the evil, that walks between madness and sensatezpara if to carry through and to changed themselves into this being that lives in search of answers. When we take otexto of the Foot. Vieira for this optics, we see that the sermon speaks to this current, full man of doubts and searching orientation divine or, restricting more the field deorientao, religious. I go, however, to try to consider the reason of the Pe.Vieira to use the fish in this metaphor to the attitudes of the men, being led emconsiderao the baroque thought.

I do not go, however, to try to justify the grandemetfora. I will make hypotheses from the baroque knowledge and of experinciade here cabvel world. First, it seems me that to speak to the fish he serves of revolt, if to consider that a man saint has the incumbency to bring ‘ ‘ words deDeus’ ‘ to the lost men. In this manner, Foot. Antonio Vieira discloses to its revoltacom the situation where the men if found and turns the coasts they to parafalar with the fish. As to look at, if to lead in consideration that the fish are the men to who the Priest speak, in send to the situation of the fish/men to them. Where they are the fish, seno dentrod’ water to listen to the message of the representative of God? As well as the fish they nopodem to leave the water total to listen to such message, they emerge of time emquando for ouviz it with more clarity.