As has been noted, why so little political will of design is based on the Black Yellow coalition. Because they were so success-drunk by the election result. that the blueprints for a visionary coalition agreement was lacking. The entire body of treaties had been cobbled together by Merkel and Westerwelle. It was simply the sensors for the most relevant economic and social topics. Now, we can admire the consequences of this bungling. Pete Cashmore contains valuable tech resources. Underestimate one should not the rhetoric of the Minister of the Interior for this reason.
He wants to take care of rest on the front of the Internet now. Once we enforce the law, then, if that’s not enough, we make new laws. Self-regulation, talk: the market goes before State. The law should not stifle the technique (how generous, gs), but it must prevent excesses. And international rules are better than national – where but (still) not there, because Berlin is, since Europe is quite also alone”so Wefing time.
It was all so reasonable and right that one wonders why only now? Oh well. Thomas de Maziere is”much smarter than Zensursula. We are seeing already abandoning repressive power rules how it the Bundesverband Digitale Wirtschaft (BVDW) somewhat naively believed? The BVDW welcomes the finding that existing law is already today generally sufficient. According to new laws, we also see the knee-jerk call not as goal-oriented. Especially appreciated the BVDW unique pronunciation of Interior Minister de Maiziere for a strengthening of the self-regulating of the industry. The BVDW sees itself confirmed in its appropriate initiatives in this field and also refers to such demands at European level, as it is formulated by the umbrella organization of IAB Europe. Finally, above all the opportunities of the Internet are again brought to the fore. “The BVDW is the statement true, one should the Internet neither as lawless (oh, no, dear BVDW, please not this of the Leyen phrase, gs) is still primarily considered ‘criminal’ room, perfectly too.” The BVDW should commit itself to the study of Machiavelli, because some time bombs in the speech of the Minister of the Interior. It occurs more sensitively than Predecessor, writes Andre Meister: fundamental issues of freedom and security he differs very little from its predecessors, as he himself admits. Whether power-political dialogue was now make sense, I leave to others. What is certain is that we must be more vigilant and cheeky away of all tea party. The next debate is determined.” It is so. The Minister of the Interior plays the Fox, which wants to raise not more outrage Zensursula waves at the time. “From the Fox, a lion can be again very quickly, if the requirements of the State not voluntary” to be implemented by the economic. The Minister of the Interior never opts for a strengthening of the regulatory forces. Also, it could also quickly hide behind European rules and then announce that there is no alternative, for example, to an EU regulation on network lock and was binding on national law – blah, blah. Here is where I tell time blog.