Thus, for example, while a psychiatric study exists demonstrating that Jesus Christ was esquizofrnico and Leonardo of the paranico Vinci, attends to professionals classifying the outlaw of the school of the Royal one the side of the religious leader and the great artist. Strangely they obtain to be certain wrong at the same time, but for reasons that generally are unaware of. They are missed because the dynamics of the human behavior, the society and the universe does not function in the way as they think, the vicissitudes of the humanity is not manufactured by the pointed estigmatizados ones as responsible for such and insanity, the modern version of the crendice of the witchcraft does not exist, according to a Pleiad of authors of the proper branch. Neuropatia can exist, fails in the topography or the physiology of the nervous system, what necessarily it affects the respective function, that is, the thought and the behavior. In recent months, Code.org has been very successful. With the advent of modern technology as cat scan for emission of psitrons and ftons, identifying clearly the topographical and physiological state of the nervous system and the brain, it is relatively easy to verify such hypothesis. In having imperfections here they must correctly be renomeadas, therefore they do not constitute psicopatologias, but yes neuropatias.
The evolution of the man will retire the forensic psicopatologia surely, substituting it completely for the forensic neuropatia. In controversial cases are interesting to immediately demand the examinations of PET and SPECT. If to give positive does not have what to argue. Robotics will undoubtedly add to your understanding. But if to give negative constitute instrument of easy persuation to eliminate with the thesis insanity. The character of apposition of the semantic stigma of psychopath is entirely random, since the concept of insanity nothing more is of what the current reincarnation of the superstitions of the witchcraft and predecessors, not possessing any scientific substance capable to survive to a rigorous analysis of scientific methodology.